The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers.
The bar charts illustrate data on why employees at different ages take part in education and the quantity of aid from their employer, measured by percentage.
Overall, while the staff aged below 40 years old tend to study for career, most over 50-year-old worker feel interested in this activity. In addition, younger staffs are given more support than the older ones from employers.
To begin with, 80% of employees less than 26 years old pursue their study for profession as opposed to one-tenth of them for enthusiasm. A similarity can be seen in the 26-to-29-year-old group, about 4 times as the people studied for career as for interest, the rates are 70% and 15% respectively. Furthermore, in the 36-39 age range, the ratio is approximately 60% for career and 20% for interest. Surprisingly, 40% of workers aged from 40 to 49 years old going to school for both aims. However, the proportion of over 49-year-old people take part in study for interest is much greater than that for occupation, 70% and 20% respectively.
On the other hand, under 26-year-old employees attract employees’ support the most, at close to 60%. This figure is double as many as people in the 30-39 age group. Besides, a half of workers aged from 26 to 29 years of age receive the help compared to more or less students aged from 40.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ge receive the help compared to more or less students aged from 40.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, thus, while, as for, in addition, more or less, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83259911894 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87988498156 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599118942731 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8317213487 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 5.23603664747 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250819126088 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104430262609 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400557408377 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155273517987 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219233533718 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.