The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two figures providing a comparison of the reasons for students to receive in various age groups, as well as the proportion of different age groups' employer support.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the percentage of people who studied for career was steadily decrease from the age group under 26 to the age group over 49, whereas the figure for interest increased from under 26 to over 49. Also evident is the fact that under 26's employees received the most largest support from employers while for those age between 30 to 39 is least supported.
With regard to the reasons for study, the two reasons had completely opposite trend throughout the age groups. For those who studied for career was most popular among the age group under 26, at 80 percent. The trend of people studied for career declined along the age group and reached the lowest at around 20 percent in the age group over 49. In contrast, people who studied for interest showed an upward trend along the age group from the lowest at ten percent in the age group under 26 to the highest at 70 percent in that over 49.
regarding to the employer support, age groups that were most supported are under 25 and 26 to 29 at 62 percent and 50 percent respectively. Third in terms of support was the age group over 49. 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 were the age group with least support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...ple who studied for career was steadily decrease from the age group under 26 to the age ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...est increased from under 26 to over 49. Also evident is the fact that under 26s empl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'largest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: largest
...t that under 26s employees received the most largest support from employers while for those ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the largest'.
Suggestion: most the largest
...t that under 26s employees received the most largest support from employers while for those ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regarding
...st at 70 percent in that over 49. regarding to the employer support, age groups tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, third, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55691056911 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29642777824 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447154471545 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7886351405 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248926443805 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133673545151 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459046431368 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18822507728 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450226916413 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.