The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
A glance at equipped charts reveals the rate of money spent on necessities every month of group having low and high salary excluding house rent or purchase .
On balance, the largest segment in the group with low income belongs to food and beverage, while the miscellaneous’s figure gains the first rank in the higher one.
From the chart of the low-income group, with 29 percent and 24 percent, the figures for both eating and fuel need are higher twice or three times than that for others. However, spending on fuel in the high-income group is lower than other needs except clothing, at only 7 percent. Moreover, with 5 percent, the rate of clothing shares the last rank with one of restaurants and hotels ( 4 percent) in the low-income group. By contrast, in the opposite group, the figure for restaurant/hotel doubles overtakes that for clothing by a wide margin in comparison between 12 percent and 6 percent.
In terms of transport, the figure for people making low income, at 9 percent, is lower than that of high-income group, at 16 percent. Conversely, with 21 percent, the figure for people making high salary make twice the one of opposite group with only 11 percent regarding recreation/ culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... salary excluding house rent or purchase . On balance, the largest segment in t...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rank with one of restaurants and hotels 4 percent in the low-income group. By c...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people making low income, at 9 percent, is lower than that of high-income group,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94634146341 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80273286775 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.0180834997 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.75 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131077112298 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748657426168 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288820477311 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962530389842 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224518800772 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.