The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
A glance at equipped charts reveals the rate of money spent on necessities every month of both low and high salary group.
On balance, the largest segment in the group with low income belongs to food and beverage, while the miscellaneous’s figure gains the first rank in the higher one.
From the chart of the low-income group, with approximately one four, the figures for both eating and fuel need are higher twice or three times than that for others. However, spending on fuel in the high-income group is lower than other needs except clothing, at only 7 percent. Moreover, with 5 percent, the rate of clothing shares the last rank with one of restaurants and hotels ( 4 percent) in the low-income group. By contrast, in the opposite group, the figure for restaurant/hotel doubles overtakes that for clothing by a wide margin in comparison between 12 percent and 6 percent.
In terms of transport, the figure for people making low income, at 9 percent, is lower than that of high-income group, at 16 percent. Conversely, the figure for people with a high salary makes twice the opposite group, regarding recreation/ culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rank with one of restaurants and hotels 4 percent in the low-income group. By c...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people making low income, at 9 percent, is lower than that of high-income group,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8772871187 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2317340754 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147248146057 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796208555291 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373624915995 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104043986162 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317215221818 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.