The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The given charts present the information about volunteers by organizations (environmental, art, sports, health care, education, and others) in the 2 years 2008 and 2014.

In general, health care volunteers accounted for the smallest percentage. In addition, noticeable rises could be seen in the portion of volunteers for educational and sports organizations.

According to the charts, in 2008, 21% of the volunteers were for environmental organizations, three times as many as health care volunteers. 6 years later, in comparison to the small increase of 1% in the percentage of healthcare volunteers, that of the environmental organization experienced an 8% rise and accounted for the largest portion.

It can also be seen that the percentages of educational and art volunteers were 24% and 18% in 2008, and they dropped by 7% and 6% over the 6-year period, respectively. By contrast, although the proportion of sports volunteers and volunteers for other organizations were the same in 2008, at 15%, the figure for sports volunteers jumped to 25% and ranked second in 2014.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sports health care education and others in the 2 years 2008 and 2014 In gener...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17058823529 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29464806654 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 170.0 22.4926829268 756% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 879.0 112.824112599 779% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 170.0 22.9334400587 741% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 41.0 5.23603664747 783% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215330201836 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215330201836 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152044168844 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335730605804 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 87.9 13.2329268293 664% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -92.61 61.2550243902 -151% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.4 10.3012195122 664% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.89 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.04 8.06136585366 187% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 11.4329268293 560% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 70.0 10.9970731707 637% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 88.0 11.0658536585 795% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.