The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The pie chart illustrates how water were consumed in Sydney, Australia in the two years 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that all of the factors were volitate a small amount during the survey. Beside, food had a dominant role through times.
Regarding food, manufacturing and building, these sectors had a downward trend. Food constantly accounted for the largest proportion through years although it witnessed a slight decrease from 48% to 41% in 2007. From the third-highest number in 1997, manufacturing became the fourth-highest by losing 4%. When it comes to building, a similar, it declined from 5% in 1997 to comprise 2% of 2007 water usage.
On the contrary, the others had an upward trend. Concerning service, it was the most remarkable trend. The number stood at 13% in the previous year, then nearly doubling to 25% in 2007, which was 4% more than the account of household in that year. Household went through a slight turbulence, starting from 19% in 1997 to 21% in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...97 and 2007. Overall, it is clear that all of the factors were volitate a small amount du...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, third, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89880952381 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77301107454 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1130102851 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8181818182 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126996751952 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472961672202 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06337075813 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889034108496 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817462692376 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.