Given pie charts depicts the preffered modes of transport for people to work, while the first chart explains the reasons for cycling, they other describes the benefits of using a car.
Firstly, majority of people choses cycling as their travel method because of the health benefits and fitness incontrast people feel more comfortable in driving a car rather than cycling. Same proportion of people who cares of the environmental benefits, as they mentioned, it won't make environmental pollution, on the other hand public thoughts that driving a car will be better if the distance to work is higher.
Those who advocate for cycling claims that, parking problem very less for cycles compared to cars but it will be time consuming, at the same time cars makes a faster reach. No energy is needed for cycling, that is the reason why 13 percentage of people likes to cycle while the others comments, it will be difficult to carry things in cycle but can be possible in cars. Finally a minority of cyclers thinks that it will be faster than driving as it won't be affected by traffic, people with cars argue that it will be safer to drive.
Overall, it will be economical healthy and environmental friendly to cycle, incontrast driving a car is safer less time taking comfortable and convenient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...car. Firstly, majority of people choses cycling as their travel method because o...
^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironmental benefits, as they mentioned, it wont make environmental pollution, on...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to cars but it will be time consuming, at the same time cars makes a faster rea...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime cars makes a faster reach. No energy is needed for cycling, that is the reaso...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...s in cycle but can be possible in cars. Finally a minority of cyclers thinks that it wi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87272727273 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61529196575 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.4544891198 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148674951678 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784203928656 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384810099525 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992337675042 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482760038282 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.