The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided chats illustrate the number of graduate and postgraduate students in the UK who chose to commit to other options: part-timing, voluntary, study or unemployment, rather than starting a full-time job life after graduating from college in 2008.

According to the first bar graph, most of the graduates, 29665 to be exact from the 30,000 fresh degree holders, decided to divulge into higher education in 2008 whereas only 3500 learners pursued voluntary works. Almost equal number of graduates opted for either part-timing (17,735) or remaining jobless (16,235).

On the other hand, a dramatic change can be noticed in the post-graduates decision about their careers. From the 3000 post-graduates, nearly all suited themselves either for studying more or working part-time, 2,725 and 2,535 respectively. While merely 345 people began working for free, 1625 of the scholars decided to to be unemployed.

Over all, it is evident that learners were more willing to stay without jobs rather than seeking to work without payment. Most students wanted to flourish their academia by studying further although some wanted to pay bills by working part-time.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... for free, 1625 of the scholars decided to to be unemployed. Over all, it is evide...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42541436464 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79468463373 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.71270718232 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.773254194 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151713560597 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599349603179 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590790799314 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959032144088 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669099822178 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.