The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the action of graduates and postgraduates in the UK after leaving colleges in 2008, excluding full-time work.
It is clear that there were more students who chose further study after graduating, while the numbers for volunteers is the lowest in both graduate and postgraduate students categories.
The number of graduates who went on to further study is the most significant, with about nearly 30.000 students. However, the number of students who chose to do voluntary work is the smallest, just 3500 in 2008. The figures for students who worked part-time and who were unemployed were about the same levels, which were 17735 and 16235 respectively.
The trends for further study people and volunteers could also be seen in the postgraduate student category. Postgraduates who chose higher education were about nine times higher than those who volunteered, standing at 2725 and 345 respectively. The figures for part-time workers in the postgraduate category is just a little smaller than those who had further study, at 2535 students. The number of unemployed postgraduate students in 2008 was 10 times smaller than graduates who did not have jobs, at 1625 students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84999392525 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7725851028 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25953381501 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129680306009 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959405045529 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200271610986 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982642809019 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.