The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar charts are the illustration of the status of the both UK graduates and postgraduates who could not secure a full-time job after they finished their study in 2008.

As is clear from the first chart, further study is the most popular alternative among the UK graduates with 29665 person, while those with part time work and who do not have a job are almost ranked after further study by 17735 and 16235 number of graduate students respectively. Albeit, graduates are not that much fond of voluntary activities in the light of the fact that only 3500 person were involved in doing that.

According to the second chart, it is distinctively demonstrated that postgraduates not only had remarkable affection for following further study by 2725 postgraduates student, but they were passionate about having part-time job (2535 students). The thing that is worthwhile to be mentioned is unemployment graduates that are approximately in the same number in comparison with graduates with 1625 person, while voluntary work is again in the bottom of the ranking composed of only 345 postgraduates in 2008.

To the nutshell, the myriad of individuals attention went toward the further study and part time-job, although unemployment persons were considerable were among both UK postgraduate and graduates in the year 2008.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...ative among the UK graduates with 29665 person, while those with part time work and wh...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...tes with 29665 person, while those with part time work and who do not have a job are almo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...in the light of the fact that only 3500 person were involved in doing that. Accordi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
... in comparison with graduates with 1625 person, while voluntary work is again in the b...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21028037383 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96388796104 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2761155576 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.833333333 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6666666667 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202250471607 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112074558945 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569407434119 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143663723463 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433047186397 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.