The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The two given charts provided data about statuses of UK graduate and postgraduate student who did not participate in the workforce after finishing their degree in the year 2008.
According to the two charts, the number of graduate and postgraduate students chose further study was highest among the four selections while those who did voluntary work was of the minority.
It can be seen from the first chart that nearly 30.000 graduate students continued learning for a higher degree, much higher than others categories while that number of postgraduate students was 2725. It is interesting to notice that unemployed graduate students was approximately of the same level as the number of graduate students doing part-time jobs whereas among postgraduate students, those who did part-time work were roughly 900 higher than the unemployed. There were great discrepancies between voluntary work sectors and other three options in both charts. Graduate and postgraduate students acted as volunteers after graduation were 3.500 and 345 students, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oyed graduate students was approximately of the same level as the number of gradu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56172839506 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86151561326 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0474542756 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.166666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339601624742 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173764187085 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887005925366 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247343609098 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532189233822 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.