The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts illustrate information about the activity chosen by graduate and postgraduate students of the UK who were not joined full-time work after completing college in the year 2008.

Overall, most of the graduate and postgraduate students were preferred to study further followed by part-time work, whereas voluntary work was gained the least interest among those.

The number of students interested in further study was almost twice as compared to those who were like to be unemployed after completing their graduation. Further, almost one-fourth of the total students were having an interest in a part-time job, whereas voluntary work was the least preferred activity among students.

On the other side, only 5% of students were started voluntary work after finishing their postgraduate study, while almost 25% of students did not have any job. Furthermore, most of the students were enrolled for further study; 2,725 students or joined part-time work; 2,535 students after having a postgraduate degree.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47712418301 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77085642899 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.2601140723 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23596909644 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143461655283 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897137978685 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178402865667 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09416106047 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.