The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two bar charts demonstrate what destinations British graduates and postgraduates were after college in the year 2008, divided into 4 categories namely part-time work, voluntary work, further study, and unemployment.
The first prominent feature is that further studying registered the highest figures in both charts while the lowest numbers belonged to volunteering activities.
In particular, 17,735 college graduates took on part-time jobs, which was pretty identical to the number of those that were jobless which was 16,235 people. Although higher education was accounted for what the majority of college students after graduation did, voluntary programs were where the least number of graduates participated which was 3,500 people.
Nevertheless, all categories in the postgraduate chart except for voluntary work witnessed similar data sizes which were above 1,500 people. A noticeable observation is that statistical results in this particular group are clearly at a much lesser extent in general. Furthermore, voluntary activities were again the least popular option decided on by only 345 postgraduates in 2008.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, nevertheless, while, except for, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90243902439 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9698815316 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676829268293 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3915034595 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209343346812 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902162395286 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076170176229 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121578117297 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719545640782 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.