The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart illustrates the ratio of water availability and its cleanliness level in Australia and South-east Asia in the year 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the majority of the Australian people are getting water supply, and the hygienic level of the water is far better than the SE Asian.
According to the first chart, in 1990 80% of the Australian population has water supply but just more than a third of the South-east Asian only has proper supply. After 20 years, almost all population in Australia are in reach, and the significant proportion of Asians about 78% are within the range of supply. The supply percentile raised nearly a fifth in the context of Australia while in SE Asia it improved by doubled than Australia.
Secondly, Australian water is almost 70% pure, which is 30% more than in Asia in 1990. The gradual improvement in the water resources improved the Australians water degree of cleanliness by more than 10% within 2 decades. Whereas, the South-east Asian peaked its distribution level but cannot maintain its hygiene and reduce its degree by a small proportion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than 10% within 2 decades. Whereas, the South-east Asian peaked its distribu...
^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educe its degree by a small proportion.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74082765154 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5817728828 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809907183983 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418139778485 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292187982374 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578102152831 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00726974030155 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.