The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar charts illustrate degree of cleanliness and amount of water supplied in Australia and South East Asia in the years 1990 and 2010. The scale is in percents.
Overall, The amount of water supplied has increased in the both countries, however degree of pure water has decreased in South East Asia.
In the preliminary year 80 percent of Australian was supplied with water, while in South East Asia the same indicator was about 35 percent. After 20 years almost 100% of people in Australia were supplied with water. Percentage of people supplied with water in South East Asia has dramatically jumped almost twice and has reached about 75 percent.
In beginning of the period quality of water in Australia was about 70 percent. In the same period of time water pureness of the citizens of South East Asia was 40 percent. Whilst water cleanliness in Australia has risen to approximately 83 percent, quality of water in South East Asia has fallen to 35 percent in the year 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he same indicator was about 35 percent. After 20 years almost 100% of people in Austr...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 92, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ralia was about 70 percent. In the same period of time water pureness of the citizens of South...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90532544379 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54300224224 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431952662722 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0946411246 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111980372275 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627014643402 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348206209627 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091640890018 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186270858729 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.