The given chart depicted that grownups involvement in education from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore. The data has been calibrated in numbers.
It is crystal clear that number of males in 2000 are 1 year ahead in education as compared to females. Although, in 2002 the education of males slightly increase however, women remains steady as before. Moving towards in 2004 only female surge in education while males remain constant. Leaping further in 2006 gradually increase in male up-to tiny friction while females remains static. Analyzing further in 2010 moderately increase in men education up-to 11 years however, females studied only 9 years of education.
To start with largest qualification in 2000 78.3% studied secondary school however, in 2010 it massive decrease up-to 15.2% although in 2000 32.13% adults goes to high school and in 2000 it felt to 19.55% moving further to primary school in 2000 25.77% carried out education in 2010. It rise to 30.51% likewise, in 2000 only 8.3% adults took university qualification and tremendously increase up-to 32.91% in 2010.
To cap it all, it is vividely seen that males taking more education in comparison of females. Normally adults studied till University education throughout the span.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'grownups'' or 'grownup's'?
Suggestion: grownups'; grownup's
The given chart depicted that grownups involvement in education from 2000 to 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the largest'.
Suggestion: with the largest
... only 9 years of education. To start with largest qualification in 2000 78.3% studied sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied secondary school however, in 2010 it massive decrease up-to 15.2% although in...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...5.77% carried out education in 2010. It rise to 30.51% likewise, in 2000 only 8.3% a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, second, so, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26130653266 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65424643083 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.621672248 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260480596473 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106616998703 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782448516252 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175174557443 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423115229897 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.