The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The above chart Illustrates, Changes that have been taken place in Tourism of countries like Australia, and Germany between the year of 1960 and 2010. The units are measured in percent’s.
Generally, in year of 1960 and 2010 no of tourists traveling to both countries Europe takes the lead. On the other hand, Asia has lowest percent in tourism in year of 1960: However, year 2010 there is Gradual increment in Tourism of Asia. When it comes to USA as well as Britain it fluctuates constantly.
From year of 1960 and 2010 we can see there’s rapid decline in tourism from Europe to Australia about 43% difference: However, Asian Tourism has a rapid increase about (10% - 63%). Both USA and Britain has fluctuates in Holiday business.
In Germany, both year of 1960, 2010 has only a significant amount of change from Europe Tourism about 5 % differences. Britain Ranks lowest about 20 to 6%. Finally, when it comes to USA tourism it has 4 % incremental value (25% - 29%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e units are measured in percent's. Generally, in year of 1960 and 2010 no o...
^^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Generally, in year of 1960 and 2010 no of tourists traveling to both countries...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...takes the lead. On the other hand, Asia has lowest percent in tourism in year of 1960: How...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8502994012 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72799339255 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0532676867 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114612695248 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453809369413 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445699608159 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824274728561 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249750062419 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.