The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
The given bar graph illustrates the information regarding the use of speed-camera whereas the line graph compares the average percentages of road accident and the deaths rates in Melbourne between the time periods of 2002 to 2005.
Over this span of 3 years, use of speed camera in Melbourne had increased dramatically whereas accidents rate was quite higher than the death ratio.
It is clearly seen that, there was a small minority in the use of speed camera in Melbourne, starting from 25 units of seed camera installed in 2002 and reached up to a peak at just below the 150 unit at the end of the period, though there was a dramatic increase was noticed in the last year where the proportion of speed camera increased three times higher than that of its initial record. Similarly, average percentage of road accident in Melbourne holds first position, rising from just above 3% in 2002 it had fluctuated in the following year and reached up to a peak at about 4% at the end of the period.
Average death percentage on the other hand started from just below the 1% in 2002 in Melbourne and there was a gradual increase on this trend up to the second half of 2004 and stabilized at just above the 1% in 2005, though there was a slight fall had noticed in the second half of 2005 in the question.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54468085106 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48803383388 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.701874223 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 213.6 112.824112599 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.0 22.9334400587 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.6 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123155476252 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781622054455 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562218908643 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867484294095 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532127099192 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.94 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.