The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the percentage of holidaymakers who stayed at four different accommodations in different years. Overall, In the initial year, the proportion of people staying at their friends' and relatives' houses during vacation made the biggest proportion. However, in the following periods, a large number of people chose hotels as their accommodation during the holiday.
In 1965, the proportion of people staying at their family or colleague's accommodations comprised 55%, followed by staying at hotel and camping sites at 16% and 15%, respectively. In this period, a relatively small number of people chose caravans as their accommodation during vacation. Although the proportion of people staying at their friends' and relatives houses made up a significant proportion, the percentage of people who rented hotel rooms was responsible for the largest proportion. In this period, 18% of visitors preferred to stay at camping sites and this figure was higher in comparison to that of 1965. Additionally, Caravans were the less favorable place to stay during holidaying.
Furthermore, in 2005, the proportion of accommodation chosen by holidaymakers comprised of 38% renting hotel rooms and 30% staying with friends or families. Staying at camping sites and Caravans made up 12% and 20%, each.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ion. However, in the following periods, a large number of people chose hotels as their accommodat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50746268657 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12591463311 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9365362482 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155601100749 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762168967258 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685339415905 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129871836322 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486663640625 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.