The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled.
Overall, this is a cyclical procedure that consists totally 3 main stages: initial collecting, processing and creating new material for other usages.
After being used, plastic bottles are discarded in recycling bins, waiting for specialized trucks to transport them to a recycling center. Once there, they are sorted and those selected ones are compressed into blocks. The blocks are then broken down by a shredding machine into small pieces, which are subsequently cleaned to remove any residue.
In the following step, the pieces produced in the last stage are then poured into a machine where they are turned into pellets. The machine also heats and melts the pellets, which creates plastic raw material. Finally, the raw material is utilized to manufacture novel items, including pens, bottles, and reusable shopping bags. After these products are used, they go through the recycling process all over again.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46710526316 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51786380845 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690789473684 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.062897029 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176582585072 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687425784487 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617323521344 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114336310684 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040274991896 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.