The given line graph illustrates data about the numbers of first marriages, remarriages and the total number of marriages from 1950 to 2001. It is manifest from the graph that, a gradual change was observed in the figure of bells, it accounted for 5 decades.
To start with, in 1951, the proportion of all marriages in the U.K. was 450000 and it was followed by first marriages at 350000. By contrast, the number of remarriages in the united kingdom was only 90000 at the same time. From 1951 to 1981, there was a considerable increase in the proportion of first and all marriages in America, while the remarriages number increased slightly with a few fluctuations to around 120000 in America.
Secondly, in the last two decades from 1981 to 2011, the figures for the first and total marriages were significantly decreased. Similarly, the remarriages decreased slightly and constant for the last two years. In 2001, the first and total bells are remain stable when they were in 1951 that is 350000and 450000 respectively. While the figure for remarriages was 110000 in 1991, but after that, it was constant for the last 2 years that is about to 100000.
Overall, it can be seen that total weddings had the highest proportion in the UK for a majority of the given time period. Also, there was a little increase in the remarriages but the other two kinds of bells leveled out in the given time in America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it was followed by first marriages at 350000. By contrast, the number of remar...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... In 2001, the first and total bells are remain stable when they were in 1951 that is 3...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75918367347 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66769590022 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477551020408 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9761305065 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0314587573082 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0157333798363 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0181489492836 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0212189486951 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171951362312 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.