the diagram below shows the progress for recycling plastic bottles
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.
The illustration named nine different stages of recycling plastic bottles from collecting the bottles to producing end products.
Overall, plastic bottles are undergone different steps to be re-shaped into consumable products and that is repeatedly recycled again.
In the initial step, the no-used plastic bottles are collected in a trash bin designed for recyclable products. After all collected products will be transferred from bins to the specialized trucks. Then, at the center, a recyclable employee will separate recyclable and non-recyclable trash into different trays. Moving to the next progress, all recyclable products are pressed into blocks before being crushed to smaller pieces by two big circles crushing machines. The pieces of trash are washed in a tank.
In the six next stages, after being washed, the plastic pieces will be transferred to the processing technology machine and that machine is turning them into plastic pellets. After that, all the pellets are heat-treated to the form raw material. Finally, the raw material will be processed to the different components before they are supplied for manufacturing new consumable stuff such as bottles, clothes, or stationary goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h bin designed for recyclable products. After all collected products will be transfer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, after all, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57608695652 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87965534984 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6445776154 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142079394122 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614955286569 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542155963703 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101627116165 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348750014994 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.