The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The presented diagram illustrates the structural design of a contemporary landfill which can be used to accommodate the waste produced by households.

Overall, designing a landfill requires three steps to follow and an area far away from human residence. Design commences with the construction of a big hole in the ground and ends with its closure.

First of all, the construction process starts with digging up a big hole in the ground. It is made sure that the lower end of this hole is supported by natural rocks. Next, this man-made hole is internally lined with clay and some artificial substance. Following this, a network of drain pipes is laid down at the bottom of the hole and also provided with a drainage tank.

After the completion of its construction, the next step is its usage. In this particular step, the hole is filled up with domestic waste. When it gets filled by the waste, the waste-liquid gets collected by the drainage tank constructed at the bottom. For closure, a thick layer of clay is laid on top of it and an opening is left out for the extraction of gases released by the organic waste.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75904385439 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2791750503 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6363636364 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788899371028 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030258308327 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424525855757 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647438052819 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505682322899 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.