The given diagrams compare the layout of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010. Overall, a lot of changes were made to the medical centre in just two years, the principal change being the addition of an education room and a mother and child room. in 2008, the main entrance, which was towards the south, opened into a waiting room. The room opened into a corridor towards the north. There was a reception in the waiting behind which there was a staff room, which also opened into the corridor. Towards the ht of the waiting room and the southeast corner of the whole building was the laboratory, hich also had its access from the waiting room. The treatment room was in the northwest corner of the building, and there were three doctor's offices along the northern wall of the medical centre, all of which had entrance through the corridor. There was vacant space on the northeast and southwest corner of the building. in 2010, in the southwest corner a mother and child room, and an education room were made, whereas a store was constructed in the northeast corner. The doctor's offices were made smaller and instead of three, there were four small doctor's offices. A pharmacy was also opened just behind the laboratory. This pharmacy opened into the corridor. The laboratory was given another access through the corridor. The rest of the plan was the same as in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ation room and a mother and child room. in 2008, the main entrance, which was towa...
^^
Line 1, column 915, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t and southwest corner of the building. in 2010, in the southwest corner a mother ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70711297071 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3137734833 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430962343096 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.965336123 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3571428571 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104578905542 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545702067074 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10194871954 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104578905542 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.