The diagram shows the process of recycling car batteries.
The diagram gives information about how to recycle old car batteries into new ones without new materials added except chemicals.
Overall, the process contains two lines and three different procedures, ending in new plastic cases, grids and glass & textile, and eventually produces new car batteries. Its raw materials are all reused from old car batteries.
Firstly, after being delivered from car garages to the factory, old batteries are classified into two lines. In this step, acid is picked up, mixed with chemicals, transformed into crystals. Those crystals are moulded to glass and textile as the end products, turning waste into useful stuff.
There are two separate procedures for another line, plastic and grid. New grids can be made through the furnace process with high temperatures, while old plastic cases are granted into powder and then turn into new plastic cases. Once putting those grids are into plastic cases, new car batteries are ready to use.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45681805672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1117764411 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186568103637 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790807680486 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755030368869 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127301835893 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662568968351 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.