The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

A glance at two maps illustrates the alterations which occurred in the seaside town of seaville between the years 1980 and 2010.

Overall, it is clear that the land of the coastal village stayed unchanged and was surrounded by the sea. However, a number of amenities were changed significantly in the structure of this village, along with the town’s capacity to provide for tourists.

In 1980, seaville was tiny, attracting only a few tourists, who were accommodated in cottages or a small hotel. In the west half of this village, there was woodland which was located in the northern side. Located to the south of woodland were holiday cottages with the view of marsh ahead and next to the hotel. in the other ones, the majority of the land was vacant while the rivers ran from the north to the sea. In addition, the east bank and sand dumps are located beside this river.

However, the village had grown dramatically by 2020. A notable change regarding the vacant area was replaced by a retirement village. The marsh had been drained and the cottages demolished in order to construct houses. to cater more tourists, both a new high-rise hotel and holiday cottages on east bank had been constructed. the woodlands had been cleared and supplanted by a golf course. Similarly, a boat club had been built on the west bank of the river. new infrastructure was created to access east bank. On the other hand, the town had preserved the original hotel.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... side. Located to the south of woodland were holiday cottages with the view of marsh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...w of marsh ahead and next to the hotel. in the other ones, the majority of the lan...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...emolished in order to construct houses. to cater more tourists, both a new high-ri...
^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ages on east bank had been constructed. the woodlands had been cleared and supplant...
^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...en built on the west bank of the river. new infrastructure was created to access ea...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82470119522 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60833583321 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533864541833 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0690667552 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6875 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0531604345691 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187219194866 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035513865991 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495346658043 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437207647003 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.