The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given diagram depicts the developmental process of a horse in a forty million years worth journey by judging the structure of the hooves.
It seems the hooves of horse have gone through four type of changes which deciphers the actual evolution of the animal. Initially, the animal was a short and goat like in structure with four toes which was called Eohippus.
Next, the Mesohippus, had one of its hooves disappeared and the middle toe had been enlarged slightly. The body looked similar to a donkey with small amount of mane on the back.
After the third change, the creature, Merychippus, began to look somewhat similar to what we know as modern horse. However, there no changes in the foot structure except the foot size had slightly increased.
Finally modern horse was evolved with horse-like hooves and long mane on the back. The two side toes were completely gone and the middle toe change into four parts which supported the horse in running.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...the foot size had slightly increased Finally modern horse was evolved with horselike...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80487804878 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30581346356 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 164.0 22.4926829268 729% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 788.0 112.824112599 698% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 164.0 22.9334400587 715% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 5.23603664747 630% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0651820909008 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651820909008 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441600300237 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485989376157 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 83.2 13.2329268293 629% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -86.52 61.2550243902 -141% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.1 10.3012195122 642% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.74 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.85 8.06136585366 184% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 67.6 10.9970731707 615% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 11.0658536585 515% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.