The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The given figure illustrates the protection solutions for the houses which easily catch the flood.
From an overall perspective, they mention two ways to deter the flood spill into the building. It is evident that stopbank plays a vital role in preventing flood from river and drain or we can upgrade the floor level. Moreover, there are a range of elements in this mission such as berm, floodgate and freebord which construct to a stopbank.
According to the first solution, the 100-year flood level hardly spill out and access the resident building thanks to the advent of stopbank. When it is rain, water may run down the slope and create the internal ponding. This ponding will release to the river and drain thorugh the holes of floodgate. In this case, the level of water may be reduced and 100-year flood level rarely transcend the slope in order to protect the house from flooding.
Moving to the second method, instead of construct a stopbank, we can raise the length of building. Although the 100-year flood may overspill, the house still in secure and get out of the flooding situation. There are a standard freeboard estimated nearly 300mm between the building and the water level. Finally, it is stated that both of these solutions can help the house stay out of flooding and in secured condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'freeboards'?
Suggestion: freeboards
...looding situation. There are a standard freeboard estimated nearly 300mm between the buil...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, moreover, second, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43139279393 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.6559111798 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203238925171 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732019467029 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659462219211 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138836202004 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486618809019 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.