The diagrams delineate the changes in the improvements of the cooking device through the period of time. It is clear that there are three stages of this transformation.
Initially, our predecessors used a simple way to cook which is to balance a pot on three stones and dry wooden sticks served as a source of fuel. Then, a clay shield in which was created to hold the stones and fire had an opening for insertion of some kinds of fuel like the first one.
In stage C, we can see a two-part specimen that is much sophisticated in comparison with the aforementioned designs. In detail, the upper chamber has a clay lining, handles to bring it wherever we want, three supporters for the cooking pot but not made by stone and the grate for keeping charcoal. Besides, its basement where collects the fuel's residue is made of metal. Moreover, it also has a door which is meant for the inlet of air and disposal of ashes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ments of the cooking device through the period of time. It is clear that there are three stage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fuels'' or 'fuel's'?
Suggestion: fuels'; fuel's
...esides, its basement where collects the fuels residue is made of metal. Moreover, it ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53012048193 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64745157743 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.308678615 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841605152023 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380544675981 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279912404896 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635609250376 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300253784747 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.