The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.
The maps reveal information on developments in a student's living place from 2010 up to present. Generally speaking, the area has recorded tremendous enhancement in its infrastructure and the layout of the building. Specifically, most changes have taken place in the initial sector of the maps.
When looking at the external part of the area it is undoubted that the garden allocated to the north of the accommodation has been extended, while that of the south has witnessed a conversion into a parking place. Moreover, situated to the left of the living room once lay another humble garden which is reconstructed into a student bedroom.
Moving on to analyse the internal sector illustrated in the maps, it is clear that a student bedroom and a bathroom positioned in the middle, alongside other two bedrooms situated in the southeastern and northeastern corner of the accommodation have not been refurbished so far. Nevertheless, there has been a depletion in size of the Main Hall to accommodate an En-suit room, in close proximity to the bathroom. Furthermore, the kitchen has been used for an additional purpose as a social area, which makes it a place of complexity. Last but not least, the living room has been altered into another bedroom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...Hall to accommodate an En-suit room, in close proximity to the bathroom. Furthermore, the kitch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06370093025 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9249994482 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122893942714 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476714047823 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410549786761 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083527170801 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236869949375 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.