Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values).
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.
The line graph illustrates the changing pattern of acidity in the mouth which cause danger in tooth health at time after in-taking three different types of sugar – fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey. Overall, cane sugar causes pH level to increase significantly within a short period of time and also remain in tooth-decaying level for an extended time.
As seen from the data, starting from the neutral pH value (7), pH value in the mouth plateaus to just 2 within 5 minutes prior to eating the cane sugar. Its figure experiences a gentle climb in the next half an hour to reach 5.5, acid level which tooth decay is unlikely, followed by a sharp increase to hit the apex at 7 after 40 minutes. Likewise, the pH change due to fruit sugar witnesses a similar pattern, where pH level rises from the low of 4.5 to 5.5 and finally to 7 after 5 minutes, 20 minutes and 35 minutes respectively.
Evidently, a completely different pattern can be seen in the change of acidity level because of honey. Sliding from pH level of 7 from the moment to eat honey, the figure stays at just below 5 for five minutes and starts to increase after 10 minutes. Surprisingly, the figure meets the neutral value within 15 minutes and levels off at 7 after 25 minutes.
All in all, while cane sugar causes higher tendency in tooth decay, it is much less probable for suffering from tooth problems by eating honey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...o increase significantly within a short period of time and also remain in tooth-decaying level...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.596 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47864801858 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.4080643772 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260321674519 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117923003985 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300431968824 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166969084354 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245188083279 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.