The first line chart illustrates the average monthly expenditure of British parents on their children's sports reported every two years from 2008 to 2014. The second one gives data about the number of children who participated in football, athletics, and swimming at the same time.
Overall, more money was spent on children's sports, therefore, more children got involved in these 3 types of sports. Specifically, football welcomed more young players than athletics or swimming.
At the first glance, in 2008, parents in England spent about 20 pounds every month on their children's sports activities. The figure increased steadily in the next 6 years and ended up with 32 pounds per month in 2014.
At the second glance, participation in football hit a difference as it was never lower than 7.5 million children engaging in this fantastic game. From 2008 to 2014, the figure was not stable but rose from about 8 to 9 million. In terms of athletics, in the first 2 years, the number of children who joined was extremely low (around 0.5 million). However, it skyrocketed to 5 million in the next 2 years with a little decrease of 0.5 million in the last 2 years. Throughout the whole period, the young participants in swimming surged stably from about 2 to 4 million.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88837209302 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70212143487 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572093023256 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4514167861 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5454545455 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352215655852 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126847731714 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106876700115 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220079434719 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138942386939 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.