The first pie chart compares the proportion of the energy consumption for different purposes in household sector in Australia, while the greenhouse gas emission rate from these activities is illustrated in the second one.
Overall, according to two pie charts, it is noticeable that Australian families use the most energy for heating while cooling activities only account for a tiny minority. However, greenhouse gas emissions are absolutely due to water heating.
In terms of the utilization of energy in the domestic sector, heating makes up a bulk of the pie, at 42 percent. This figure is six times more than the consumption of refrigeration. Besides, water heating, which represents one-third of the total, consumes the amount of energy which is equivalent to twice as much as the figure for the other appliances. On the other hand, the percentage of power used in cooling and lighting just accounts for a trivial rate, at about six percent (in which two percent for cooling and four percent for lighting)
Corresponding to the energy use, water heating emits about 32 percent of gas waste, whereas heating is responsible for 15 percent of the total. This figure is the equal percentage of emissions which are caused by refrigeration. Similarly, cooling leads to about three percent of toxic gas, which is proportional to nearly half of greenhouse gas from lighting. 28 percent of emissions comes from the other devices.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16309012876 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8612610871 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532188841202 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.8145518614 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.3 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249977930767 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10451852321 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578173456169 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175698095451 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058661234447 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.