The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first pie describes the energy consumption of an Australian family in percentage and the second pie is about the information of greenhouse gas emission as a consequence of the first chart.
According to the pie charts, six energy sources are mainly analysed. A household spends the majority of the whole energy usage on heating, covering up to 42% of the first pie chart, although it covers only a quarter of the total gas emission in the second chart. Meanwhile, water heating has 30% of energy usage while it has the largest proportion in the emission chart.
Surprisingly, the second largest greenhouse gas emission comes from the usage of other appliances with 28% although the devices are not mentioned whilst it only has 15% of the first chart. Greenhouse gas is mostly emitted from the refrigerator as it doubles the percentage of its actual usage in the household. The other energy usages such as cooling and lighting describe only as the smallest fractions as in around 2% to 10% in both charts.
To sum up, the overwhelming usage of heaters does not contribute to the majority of greenhouse gas emission while it is mainly covered by the usage of water heating other devices and refrigerators.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from the usage of other appliances with 28% although the devices are not mention...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96585365854 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79367859554 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2567562633 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306804084351 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147926843729 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867401706594 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207665142835 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096615498764 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.