The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
In the first pie chart, the percentage distribution of energy use in an average Australian household
is portrayed. The percentage of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from this energy use is
demonstrated in the second pie chart.
At first, it can be interpreted from the first pie chart that in an average Australian householod
cooling requires the lowest percentage of energy use whuch is 2% followed by lighting which uses 4%
of total energy use. Refrigation takes up 7% of the usage of energy. The major percentages of energy
consumption are for water heating with 30% consumption and heating with 42% consumption which
is the highest perentage of energy use. Other household appliances uses 15% of the total energy
distribution. Secondly, from the second pie chart, the pecentage distribution of greenhouse gas
emissions from the same household appliances shows that water heating is responsible for the
highest percentage of emission that is 32%. 15% of the greenhouse gas is produced due to heating
and refrageration produces alomost similar percentage of emission that is 14%. Lighting and cooling
release comparatively smalller percentage of the poisonous gas into nature with 8% and 3%
emissions respectively. Remaining 28% gas emissions is beacuse of other appliances.
From both of the pie charts, it can be interpreted that in an average Australian household, the
relation of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission is almost proportional. Cooling with
lowest percentage of energy consumption, produces the lowest percentage of greenhouse gas.
Lightins exhibits similar feature. The activities heating and water heating which uses the highest
amount of energy, also releases the major percentage of greeanhouse gas. Other household
activities show almost similar proportional relation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...mission is almost proportional. Cooling with lowest percentage of energy consumption, produ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67391304348 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12344899548 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427536231884 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 283.868780488 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6447016253 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 20.0 3.83414634146 522% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496038966841 0.215688989381 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17945421729 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151754228877 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163027438094 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113476888789 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.