The pie charts illustrates the different ways though which power is used in a regular Australian family and the amount of greenhouse gases emitted as a result of this energy use.
Overall, an avergare family in Australia used most of their power for heating purposes. Furthermore, it is clearly seen that, water heating and other appliances emitted the highest amount of greenhouse gas.
To begin, Although 42% of energy was used for heating purposes, it only emitted 15% of greenhouse gas. The proportion of energy used for water heating was almost similar to it's greenhouse gas emission(30% and 32%). Only 7% of energy was used for refrigeration, however; it emitted 15% of greenhouse gases.
Secondly, 4% of the power was used for lighting and it emitted 8% of greenhouse gas. Other appliances produced 28% of greenhouse gases from 15% of energy consumption. Finally, in the case of cooling, energy usage and greenhouse gas emission were almost similar, at 2% and 3%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it is clearly seen that, water heating and other appliances emitted the highest...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portion of energy used for water heating was almost similar to its greenhouse gas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12345679012 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85623093858 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5324160462 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325497836784 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155240972138 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751778642402 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219893310975 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864646749064 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.