The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The pie charts compare the percentages of household energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions coming from such energy use in Australia.
It is noticeable that not only does heating (including water heating) consume most household energy but also pollutes most while cooling accounts for the least proportions in terms of both energy usage and greenhouse gas.
Looking at the most energy-consuming sources, up to 72% of energy goes to heating and water heating, which consequently release nearly half of the total greenhouse gas amount. However, the remarkable difference could be seen in the heating activities accounting for over 40% of the total energy consumed but surprisingly 15% in gas emissions while water heating’s figures remained relatively similar in both categories (about 30%). In contrast, cooling only uses up of 2% of energy and emits 3% of the greenhouse fumes.
Dramatic differences are also seen in the energy use and emission gap when we compare the percentages of lighting, refrigeration and other appliances. These comprise 8%,14% and 28% respectively in energy usage but all take up twice as much in gas release.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as emissions coming from such energy use in Australia. It is noticeable that ...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivities accounting for over 40% of the total energy consumed but surprisingly 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36464088398 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97787492686 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7889609445 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30659287739 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16742897154 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11113208352 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223822109755 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117545788415 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.