The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use

The given charts compare the way each Australian family consume energy and the amount of greenhouse gas released to atmosphere due to their usages.
Overall, in Australia, people tend to consume energy for heating and do not use much on cooling. It is noticeable that water heating account for the most percentage of greenhouse gas emission, while cooling made up the least.
The most amount of enery is spent on house heating (42%), while only about 15% of greenhouse gas results from it. The proportion of power used for water heating is slightly lower (30%), and this leads to 32% gas produced.
Turning to the other factors, we can see that Australian use about 7% of power for refrigeration, while 14% gas emission comes from this usage. Energy for lightning and cooling only take up a negligible amout (4% and 2% respectively), therefore, the percentage of greenhouse gas emitted is only 3% (from cooling) and 8% (from lightning). By contrast, for other applications, people use a large amount of energy (15%) and this usage releases 28% greenhouse gas to atmosphere.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
therefore, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92777777778 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74524842025 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0505891803 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278535100533 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128916806601 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436095914343 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170821300788 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498142403606 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.