The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The pie chart compares the energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in an average Australian household.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that most Australian residents consume energy and greenhouse gas emissions for heating and water heating respectively. Nevertheless, both pie graphs should observe the reversed pattern for cooling.
Taking a first look at Australia's energy consumption graph, it is obvious heating function accounts for 42 percent, which is more than two times when compared with the others except water heating. Following that, the share of volume heating occupies nearly one-third of the total. Subsequently, the proportion of energy used for refrigeration, cooling, and lighting is under 10 percent and others elements stand for exactly 15 percent.
Moving to the second graph, the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions consumed for water heating has the same pattern as energy use and hosts the first rank in this pie graph. The share of heating and refrigeration in this pie chart nearly meets a similar record, with no more than 15 percent in each portion. Finally, the proportion of cooling and lighting in the second graph is still under 10 percent, and greenhouse gas emissions for other appliances is merely higher than two times when compared with the former graph.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, nevertheless, second, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37019230769 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81659793501 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1761982563 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263856320958 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127965474427 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126308661498 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214181510883 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122453809094 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.