The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of
100,000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period
1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
The given tables depict about the survey of one hundred thousand UK citizens who visit foreign countries for the four different purposes and also give the information about their destinations for the period of 1994 to 1998.
Overall, it can be seen that most citizens had travelled abroad for the holiday. Also, in 1997 and 1998, visits were at a peak. Apart from that, their favorite destination was Western Europe throughout the period.
Categorically speaking, in 1994, 15,246 UK residents had visited abroad for the holiday purpose. The numbers decreased in the following year, it was 14,898, which increased moderately to 20,700 in the year 1998. The second purpose was business. There were 3,155 people who visited abroad for business in 1994, that grew to 3,957 in 1998. UK people who travelled abroad to meet their peers was 2,689 and 3,181 in 1994 and 1998 respectively. Moreover, Western Europe was visited by 19,371 UK residents in 1994. Those numbers surged up and reached to 24,519 in 1998. However, North America was the least visited place by UK residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12921348315 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5061469689 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.65446269 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0833333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12534076602 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049594974547 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440715492976 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984707643391 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148152193738 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.