The given two graphs compare the data about the number of people who traveled to foreign countries including 3 different regions such as Western Europe, North America and Other Areas, during four-year span, from 1994 to 1998. An interesting point to be noted from the graph is that maximum people preffered their foreign trips for holidays.
Overall, while X axis represents the timeline, reason of travel and the number of people are indicated by Y axis. Additionally, during this time frame least number of people visited to North America as compared to other two regions.
Maximum number of people traveled to Western Europe and the purpose of their visit was holiday. Approximately 24500 people visited that region in 1998 and this number decreased slightly in 1997 with about 24000. Furthermore it is cogent from the graph that in 1998, 20700 people, which was highest, traveled abroad for their holidays, while only 990 people's reason for abroad trip was some other reasons.
In addition, in 1994, less number of people, which is close to 1000, chose their preffered destination as North America and this number climed steadily to about 3000 in 1998. However, Other Areas was the second chosen destination during this time span. It is clear from the graph that the second highest reason of travel to foreign destination was Business, which is followed by visit to friends and relatives. The highest business visit was in 1998 with 3957, which went down significantly with 3155 in 1994.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'frame the least'.
Suggestion: frame the least
... Y axis. Additionally, during this time frame least number of people visited to North Ameri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ased slightly in 1997 with about 24000. Furthermore it is cogent from the graph that in 199...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41855313544 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518218623482 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0005634825 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160964833142 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727769681476 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422173362875 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108002593548 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372389397375 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.