The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The number of people traveling by trains is depicted in the first line graph, meanwhile, the second one reveals information on the proportion of trains activating on time compared with the target. Overall, the figure for train travellers fluctuated over the given period, however, the percentage of trains following schedules exactly witnessed an upward trend.
When looking at the first line graph, from 2000 to 2002, the number of people using trains grew minimally by approximately 5 million then decreased considerably and hit a bottom at its original statistic in 2003 at slightly above 35 million. In contrast, the figure for train travellers reached a peak at over 45 million in 2005. From 2006 to 2008, there was a slight drop of more than 5 million, which was followed by a recovery between 2008 and 2009.
Moving on to describe the second graph, in 2000, the percentage of trains running on time was 3% lower than the standard line which maintained at 95%, however, a dramatical growth was recorded making the figure 1% higher than the target. After that, the statistic of trains without delays fell remarkably to its original state at 92%, before it rose rapidly and reached a plateau at 97%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...08, there was a slight drop of more than 5 million, which was followed by a recov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95073891626 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62494561638 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.169348236 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358992731527 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159445286806 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107393132665 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247951686624 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956050976777 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.