The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The first line chart describes the figures for people who traveled by train between 2000 to 2009 (in million). Meanwhile, the second chart shows the proportion of trains being punctual in comparison with the goal.
It is clear that there was a fluctuation in the number of train passengers. Besides, the percentage of trains being on time was lower than the target.
Looking at the first chart, the number of train travelers was 35 million in 2000, then it increased significantly to 42 million in 2002. After that, the figure recovered to its initial point in 2003, before soaring to 45 million after two years. From 2005 to 2008, the number declined gradually to 40 million, after which it climbed again at the end of the period.
Turning to the second chart, at the beginning of the period, the percentage of trains running on time was under the target line, at 92%. Afterward, it grew to reach the goals at 95% in 2002 and continued climbing for 2 years to 96%. However, between 2004 and 2006, the proportion of trains experienced a downward trend, decreasing by 4%. Then, it soared to 97% in 2008 before staying stable in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...aveled by train between 2000 to 2009 in million. Meanwhile, the second chart shows the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73869346734 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50638436332 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1295310504 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7272727273 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346603331459 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128920871625 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089010979213 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214782360478 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511749846379 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.