The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company.
The pie chart below illustrates the information regarding the average time consumed by an in-house training course whereas the bar graph compares the average hours spend by manager and secretary in a finance company.
A glance at the figure reveals that, an overwhelming majority of time is required by the technical course and secretary work is more focused on important office work.
As a matter of fact, 30 hours out of 60 hours were consumed by financial company in regards to train their employee in a year. Similarly, career development holds the second position with taking 15 hours’ time compared to 10 hours allocated for developing interpersonal skills in the question. Health and safety is the least priority in a financial company where it only contains the 5 official hours to empower the staff personal.
In the second figure, it is a manager who contributes their half of the time for making good network to the outer market in comparison to secretary in the office. Moreover, nearly 70 percent of the management person in the finance office makes excellent excuse for change compared to just above 60 percent of officers who make the excuses for change. It is also interesting to note that quite majority of office time is consumed by manager for not doing work in office and it is secretary who focused more in the important office activities in contrast to top level authority in the question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below illustrates the information regar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ours were consumed by financial company in regards to train their employee in a year. Similar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast, as a matter of fact, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96652719665 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73236173827 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548117154812 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.8599707195 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.375 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13378898184 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630668649481 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11392681549 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110741424947 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143430014255 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.