The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates the amount of water used for agriculture, industry, and households from all over the world, while the table compares the water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
In general, global water use grew consequently from 1900 to 2000, and the amount of water used for agriculture ranked first among the three categories. In addition, water consumption was significantly higher in Brazil than in the Congo for different purposes.
As can be seen from the line graph, the majority of water use belonged to agriculture in 1900, at approximately 900km3. Nevertheless, the figures for industrial and domestic water use were nearly one-fifth of that of agriculture. The 1900-2000 period witnessed the largest increase of roughly 3000km3 in the amount of water used for agriculture. Likewise, industrial and domestic uses stood at about 1300 km3 and 300km3 in 2000 respectively.
Turning to the table, the population of Brazil (176 million) was just over 33 times much more than in the Congo (5.2 million) in 2000. Brazil had 26400km2 irrigated land more than in the Congo. As a result, water consumption in Brazil and the Congo for people were 359m3 and 8m3 in order.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for people were 359m3 and 8m3 in order.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, while, in addition, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83726687124 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.524773714 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276116485144 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122795441414 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767824925892 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191978768341 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808273096209 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.