The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates the amount of water used for agriculture, industry, and households from all over the world, while the table compares the water consumption in Brazil and the Congo in 2000.
Overall, while global water use grew considerably from 1900 to 2000 in the three categories, the amount of water used for agriculture ranked first. In addition, water consumption in Brazil was significantly higher than in the Congo.
It is clear that the majority of water use belonged to agriculture in 1900, at approximately 500km3. Next came industrial purpose, at about 100km2. Nevertheless, only under 50km3 of water was used for homes. The 1900-2000 period witnessed the most substantial increase of roughly 2500km3 in the amount of water used for agriculture. Likewise, the industry stood at about 1300 km3 in 2000. Conversely, global water used for homes was the lowest, which accounted for under 500km3.
Turning to the table, the population of Brazil (176 million) was just over 33 times much more than in the Congo in 2000. Brazil had 26400km2 irrigated land more than in the Congo. As a result, water consumption in Brazil was under 45 times higher than in the Congo (8m3).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06091370558 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72882183417 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3342355547 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0833333333 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261807204948 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110456342558 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731567884701 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186329862558 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079800260045 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.