The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates the amount of water used for agriculture, industry, and households from all over the world, while the table compares the water consumption in Brazil and the Congo in 2000.
Overall, while global water use grew considerably from 1900 to 2000 in the three categories, the amount of water used for agriculture ranked first. In addition, water consumption in Brazil was significantly higher than in the Congo.
It is clear that the majority of water use belonged to agriculture in 1900, at approximately 500km3. Next came industrial purpose, which accounted for about 100km2. Nevertheless, only under 50km3 of water was used for homes. The 1900-2000 period witnessed the most substantial increase of roughly 2500km3 in the amount of water used for agriculture. Likewise, industry stood at about 1300 km3 in 2000. Conversely, global water used for homes was the lowest among the three purposes, which was under 500km3.
Turning to the table, the population of Brazil (176 million) was just over 33 times much more than in the Congo in 2000. Also, Brazil had 26400km2 irrigated land more than in the Congo in 2000. As a result, water consumption in Brazil was under 45 times higher than in the Congo (8m3).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04901960784 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69618092497 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1396001475 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253156047076 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109336394745 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736320568266 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184471282783 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803609410752 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.