The graph illustrates how much water spend globally in the years between 1900 and 2000 while the table shows number of expended water in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo by cubic kilometer and kilometer square respectively in the year of 2000.
Overall, usage of water assessed by agriculture, industrial use and domestic use and agricultural utilization was the highest while domestic use was lowest. In the comparison of Brazil and Conga for water consumption, Brazil preceded in every area.
In the graph, it can be seen industrial and domestic use were almost 0% in the beginning of the period and both of them steadily increase year by year. Industrial use reached to nearly 1000 cubic kilometer while domestic use rose to less than a half of 1000 cubic kilometer. As the first one, agriculture was already closed to 500 cubic kilometer in 1900 but it peaked to more than 3000 cubic kilometer in 2000.
In the table, population of water consumption in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million in 2000. Also there was a huge difference in irrigated land. Brazil had 26,500 kilometer square although Congo had just 100 kilometer square. The last parameter was water consumption per person in 2000 and Brazil’s result was 359 meter square but Congo was 8 meter square.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...strial use reached to nearly 1000 cubic kilometer while domestic use rose to less than a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
... rose to less than a half of 1000 cubic kilometer. As the first one, agriculture was alre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...culture was already closed to 500 cubic kilometer in 1900 but it peaked to more than 3000...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...0 but it peaked to more than 3000 cubic kilometer in 2000. In the table, population of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re 176 million and 5.2 million in 2000. Also there was a huge difference in irrigate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98642533937 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65658262746 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8752395572 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129834174701 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057003185573 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365731696471 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903705822165 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345744963338 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...strial use reached to nearly 1000 cubic kilometer while domestic use rose to less than a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
... rose to less than a half of 1000 cubic kilometer. As the first one, agriculture was alre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...culture was already closed to 500 cubic kilometer in 1900 but it peaked to more than 3000...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...0 but it peaked to more than 3000 cubic kilometer in 2000. In the table, population of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re 176 million and 5.2 million in 2000. Also there was a huge difference in irrigate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98642533937 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65658262746 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8752395572 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129834174701 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057003185573 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365731696471 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903705822165 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345744963338 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.