The given graph illustrates the global water use in different sectors( agriculture, industrial and domestic) between 1900 and 2000 and the table shows the consumption of water in Brazil and Congo in the year 2002.
Overall, water use in all these three sectors experienced steady growth while, agriculture had the constantly higher position over the period given. However, Brazil showed a greater consumption of water and least was that by Congo.
In 1900, water used in agriculture was about 500km, being highest portion of the graph. It had a steady but continuous growth until 1950( about 1000km) and then it rose dramatically throughout the period, hitting the high point of approximately 3000km in 2000. Whereas, water for industrial and domestic use was almost same point, around 100km at the beginning of the period. For industry, it remained constant till 1949 and for domestic it stayed stable till 1960. After that, both of them had a gradual increase, reaching to almost 1100km and 400km respectively at the end of the period.
The population of Brazil was at 176 million and the land was 26,500 km, which accounted for 359m consumption of water per person. In contrast, Congo had the very little population, with 5.2million and thus small land(100m). They used small proportion of water(8m).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...rates the global water use in different sectors agriculture, industrial and domestic be...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the highest'.
Suggestion: being the highest
...er used in agriculture was about 500km, being highest portion of the graph. It had a steady b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18357487923 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67456646856 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613526570048 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5912489791 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5454545455 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226674226527 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881642165931 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847486164181 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155313192591 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700084120896 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.