The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
The presented line chart depicts the difference of the birth rates between China and USA in the period from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, it experienced a remarkable decreas comparing to that of in the first year.
In 1920, the birth proportion of USA stayed at 12%, followed by one of China at 10 out of 100. After that, both of which fluctuated from 1920 to 1930 and stood at the same point in the year 1920. In 1935, the China’s birth rates reached significantly at peak (15%), whereas USA saw a slight increase by 2%. After having witnessed a dramatical drop to 5 out of 100 in 1940, the birth percentage in China not changed between 1940 and 1945. On the other hand, therre was a tremendous reduction of 5% in the birth rates of USA in the year 1945.
In the following years, not only the USA’s birth rates but also China’s birth rates climbed dramatically to peak, at 15% and 25% respectively in 1950. Interestingly, during the last fifty years, both of which decreased significantly and stayed at 3% (the birth propotion of China) and 7% ( USA’s birth rates).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 3% the birth propotion of China and 7% USA's birth rates.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64921465969 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74915478512 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6794100159 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419001484655 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180168314141 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902105350394 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250989408421 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123970048906 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.